June 23, 2023

Rethinking Higher Education delivery in the post-Covid landscape

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on various aspects of society, including education. Education providers were compelled to move to online modes of teaching and learning in 2020. While this was a major challenge it also presented an opportunity to rethink the way we deliver education.


We asked Dr Jan Mentz, Academic Dean at Belgium ITversity,  to share his perspective on the swift transition to online modes of delivery prompted by the Covid lockdown period and to reflect on the factors institutions must consider when deciding on the most suitable delivery mode.   


The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to draw significant research interest, as seen in the multitude of publications available on platforms like Google Scholar. The imperative to stay at home affected every aspect of human life, including social interactions, remote work, and education. Virtually everything transitioned to some form of online mode. In the face of a life-threatening disease, life had to go on, prompting the need for innovative approaches.


Transition to online education


In South Africa, higher education institutions shifted to online delivery for a period of two years (2020-2022) under the guidance of Emergency Remote Teaching concessions. While the impact of this shift is still under investigation, key concerns revolve around access to learning and the use of technology.


Prior to the lockdown, South African institutions were neatly categorized as either face-to-face or distance learning institutions, each with their respective delivery modes. But, the forced move to online education proved to be a game changer, shifting the perception of education accessed through technology.


Throughout the lockdown, education continued in some form or another. Higher education institutions in South Africa responded by providing students with laptops and broadband internet access, although these interventions were often challenging and costly to implement. It is important to acknowledge that the success of online education was likely more prominent in areas with established infrastructures, potentially leaving rural regions at a disadvantage.


On the teaching side, educators were thrust into a new teaching reality, often unfamiliar to them. There is a stark difference between lecturing in person versus conducting virtual classes on platforms like MS Teams. Nevertheless, both in-person and virtual approaches allowed higher education institutions to facilitate student graduation. The initial emergency measures in 2020 paved the way for a more planned and deliberate approach in 2021, with valuable lessons learned and needs becoming clearer.


The way forward


In charting the way forward, we need to consider questions such as: How should we proceed post-Covid? Should we simply revert to pre-COVID methods? What about the infrastructure investments?


Recognising the need to address the implications of the pandemic-induced changes, the Council of Higher Education (CHE) established a task team on blended and online learning to develop guidelines based on the current post-COVID reality. The task team concluded its work in early 2023, and the CHE is currently reviewing the report. While awaiting the conclusion of this process, it is crucial to contemplate the best way forward for both students and institutions.


Firstly, it is imperative to establish clear definitions for the different modes of delivery as the broader educational community lacks consensus on common definitions.


Secondly, it is crucial to consider which delivery mode would best serve South African students, taking into account the cost of education and the unequal distribution of digital infrastructure in the country.


Thirdly, assessing the digital literacy levels of students is essential. Does the ability to use a smartphone equate to competent usage of the internet and basic word processing software?


Lastly, we need to examine the impact of a blended approach, combining online and in-class teaching modes, on institutional costs, staff productivity, and the demands of assessment and curriculum design.



This list of considerations is by no means exhaustive, but clarity in these areas is critical in mapping the way forward.

May 9, 2025
This week, SAPHE hosted a delegation from Semesp, the association representing private higher education institutions in Brazil. The visit provided a valuable opportunity for mutual learning, collaboration, and comparative dialogue between the South African and Brazilian private higher education sectors. The visit began with an insightful presentation by Dr Whitfield Green, CEO of the Council on Higher Education (CHE), who introduced the South African higher education landscape. He outlined the CHE’s role in ensuring quality, relevance, and transformation in the sector - providing essential context for the week’s discussions. In meetings with the SAPHE Board and member institutions, the Semesp delegation engaged in conversations covering a wide range of topics—from the integration of emerging technologies and AI, the promotion of entrepreneurship and collaboration with industry, effective marketing and student recruitment strategies, to distance education and strong governance and management practices within private institutions. One of the most striking comparisons highlighted during the exchange was in student enrolment figures. In Brazil, private institutions dominate the landscape: 87.8% of all higher education institutions are private. These institutions enrol nearly 8 million students, while only around 2 million attend public universities. Among these private institutions, 65.1% are for-profit. This stands in sharp contrast to South Africa, where public universities continue to enrol more than 70% of students. However, the private sector has shown significant growth in recent years, with the number of students in private higher education institutions more than doubling since 2011. With more and more South African students seeking access to higher education, it’s clear that private institutions have a key role to play in expanding capacity and helping move the sector forward.  Both SAPHE and Semesp affirmed the value of such engagements to stimulate new thinking and the importance of collaboration in advancing innovation, quality, and sustainable growth in higher education.
April 25, 2025
The launch meeting of SAPHE’s Community of Practice (CoP) for Quality Assurance on 15 April was an explosion of ideas and energy. The value of a dedicated platform for members to engage on quality assurance (QA) matters was immediately evident, as participants enthusiastically identified key topics for discussion, knowledge sharing, and the exchange of best practices. The vital thread of QA Quality Assurance is a cornerstone of higher education, underpinning the integrity and effectiveness of academic offerings and institutional operations. From marketing and student recruitment to graduation, the QA thread is tightly woven through every stage of the student journey. Engaging questions, meaningful conversations “How do we measure quality, and how do we evidence quality?” These thought-provoking questions, posed by the session facilitator Dr Franzel du Plooy-Cilliers—SAPHE Vice-Chair and responsible for liaison with regulatory bodies—sparked dynamic and insightful discussions. Attendees shared their experiences and explored ways to support one another in preparing for institutional audits, benchmarking across institutions, and embedding quality throughout institutional processes. Looking ahead  The conversation has laid the foundation for what promises to be a series of meaningful engagements as the CoP continues to grow and evolve.
April 15, 2025
Often seen as the “stepchild” of higher education, community engagement (CE) took centre stage during SAPHE’s Faranani session held on 10 April.
More Posts